Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Chevy Equinox Generations Forum
3rd Gen : 2018-2024 Chevy Equinox
Chevy Equinox Audio & Electronics
GM penalizes those who bought Navigation option and rewards those who didn't with Maps+?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="JackT" data-source="post: 20386" data-attributes="member: 7055"><p>I have been using my phone in the past. The new vehicle I set up with Android Auto and AAWireless too. However, the integrated approach rather than two different environments is nice too. Since the car came with GM NAV, I thought I could just update the maps. I received a response on how the 2023 maps are coming out the end of this month and that each update costs $149. Then I thought about Maps+ etc. and GM's strategy started to not make sense.</p><p></p><p>I understand HERE is involved from prior, but Maps+ integrages too. However, from HERE's perspective, I would THINK it would be MORE profitable today for them to offer users $149 with future updates free because as things stand with Maps+ and Android Auto, they can't have many takers, and probably not enough revenue to maintain them. One user in Arizona complained about the 2022 update that didn't reflect a highway opened two years prior. I would THINK it would be a lot MORE profitable for GM/HERE to offer existing owners updates for $149 with free future updates because with Maps+ and Android Auto competing, they are already in the position of trying to sell snowballs to Eskimos. </p><p></p><p>I'm trying to make sense of the lay of the land. GM charges more for data connections that are tied to a vehicle that require very little data, than individuals pay with a phone number with data that travels with them, and can use for any purpose in any vehicle. Auto makers are in no position to force a subscription by dropping Android Auto now that everyone has a smart phone and tablet that they take with them. They don't need their infotainment center for navigation. I'm just having a rough time accepting that HERE and GM, and GM spent resources on Maps+ with free updates for those who DIDN'T buy NAV, and then charge $149 to those who DID spend the big bucks, for once-a-year updates that are not automatic, with neither supported by a competitive Internet connection.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="JackT, post: 20386, member: 7055"] I have been using my phone in the past. The new vehicle I set up with Android Auto and AAWireless too. However, the integrated approach rather than two different environments is nice too. Since the car came with GM NAV, I thought I could just update the maps. I received a response on how the 2023 maps are coming out the end of this month and that each update costs $149. Then I thought about Maps+ etc. and GM's strategy started to not make sense. I understand HERE is involved from prior, but Maps+ integrages too. However, from HERE's perspective, I would THINK it would be MORE profitable today for them to offer users $149 with future updates free because as things stand with Maps+ and Android Auto, they can't have many takers, and probably not enough revenue to maintain them. One user in Arizona complained about the 2022 update that didn't reflect a highway opened two years prior. I would THINK it would be a lot MORE profitable for GM/HERE to offer existing owners updates for $149 with free future updates because with Maps+ and Android Auto competing, they are already in the position of trying to sell snowballs to Eskimos. I'm trying to make sense of the lay of the land. GM charges more for data connections that are tied to a vehicle that require very little data, than individuals pay with a phone number with data that travels with them, and can use for any purpose in any vehicle. Auto makers are in no position to force a subscription by dropping Android Auto now that everyone has a smart phone and tablet that they take with them. They don't need their infotainment center for navigation. I'm just having a rough time accepting that HERE and GM, and GM spent resources on Maps+ with free updates for those who DIDN'T buy NAV, and then charge $149 to those who DID spend the big bucks, for once-a-year updates that are not automatic, with neither supported by a competitive Internet connection. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Chevy Equinox Generations Forum
3rd Gen : 2018-2024 Chevy Equinox
Chevy Equinox Audio & Electronics
GM penalizes those who bought Navigation option and rewards those who didn't with Maps+?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top